The next time I was camera shopping (a year or so later) – the macro capabilities were an important part of the decision. I had the
Aside from the color accent feature – I have yet to replace the macro capabilities of these fixed lens cameras with my digital SLR. And really – why should I? Why should I go out to find and purchase a macro lens that may or may not completely fit my needs when my fixed lens cameras do exactly what I want? The Canon S2 IS even has this handy flip out and around LCD. I always tell anyone that if anything should happen to that S2 – I will have to replace it with the latest version available at the moment. Right now – the latest version is the S5 IS. The S5 has more megapixels than my S2 and it has a hot shoe for Speedlite flashes, mine does not. I am sure there are many other super cool enhancements over my almost three-year old camera – but as long as they keep that super macro mode with the 0 cm minimum focus distance – I will buy one.
Why do I need to consider purchasing a macro lens for my SLR? I mean, I could, I would use it. At some point I most likely will get one. BUT – in the mean time I don't think I really "need" it. I can take macro-ish-like photos with the SLR and the zoom I have now. I am pleased with many of those shots. But to get up close, use the natural light, and get that super macro shot with super thin depth of field – the S2 or the old
What have I bought lately? More ink (I am always running out of magenta or light magenta – this time it was light magenta and yellow), some matte paper to try out, Ilford Smooth Pearl paper to try, a Manfrotto 190XPROB tripod and Manfrotto 808RC4 3-way pan/tilt head. I haven't tried the papers yet. Hurray! the ink came before I ran out of light magenta completely. The tripod and head are awesome – but it is heavier than I was hoping. Last time I bought a tripod based on it being light – I was unhappy with it (rickety) – so I will love this being heavy (sturdy) and being a good tripod for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment